Wind Energy Permitting
In Minnesota, the Public Utilities Commission is responsible for permitting wind energy projects that are five megawatts (MW) or larger. Developers seeking to build a wind project of this size must obtain a site permit from the PUC.
Review Process
For smaller wind projects, specifically those up to 25 MW, a county can issue the permit if it formally notifies the PUC of its intent to assume this authority. Counties also have the option to establish stricter regulations for wind projects within their jurisdiction. The PUC will adhere to these county-specific rules for projects in that county, unless there is a compelling reason not to.
For smaller wind projects, specifically those up to 25 MW, a county can issue the permit if it formally notifies the PUC of its intent to assume this authority. Counties also have the option to establish stricter regulations for wind projects within their jurisdiction. The PUC will adhere to these county-specific rules for projects in that county, unless there is a compelling reason not to.
The permitting process explained
Standard Review
Application submission and initial review
Once an applicant applies for a wind project, the PUC will conduct an initial review. This check ensures the application includes all the information legally required to describe the proposed project and its potential human and environmental impacts.
For smaller wind projects, specifically those up to 25 MW, an applicant may request approval from a local unit of government, most often the county where the project is located. The local unit of government may request that the PUC assume permitting jurisdiction.
Public engagement and review
After the application is accepted, the review process begins. The PUC will:
- Hold a public meeting: This meeting explains the PUC's review process, describes the proposed project, and gathers initial input from the public.
- Open a public comment period: During this time, anyone can submit their comments. This public input helps the PUC decide what to include in a draft permit and whether potential impacts need further review.
Environmental Assessment Addendum (if needed)
If the PUC determines that potential impacts require review, an addendum to the environmental assessment (EA) that was part of the application will be prepared.
Public hearing and Administrative Law Judge report
Once the draft permit and, if necessary, the EA addendum are available:
- An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) from the Office of Administrative Hearings will oversee a public hearing.
- At this hearing, people can give presentations, share evidence, and ask questions about the project.
- After the public comment period closes, the ALJ will write a report for the PUC.
Final Commission decision
The PUC will then review all the information, including any EA addenda), the ALJ’s report, and all public comments. Based on this comprehensive review, the PUC will make the final decision on whether to grant a permit for the project.
Permitting timeline
The standard permitting timeline is six months. However, this can be extended by up to three months for good cause.
Relevant statutes and rules
Relevant statutes: Minn. Stat. 216I
Relevant rules: Minn. Rules 7850.2800 – 7850.3900
The PUC's role
The PUC's involvement in the permitting process includes:
- Review: The PUC staff thoroughly reviews all submitted materials and public input.
- Record building: The PUC helps build a comprehensive public record for each project, ensuring all relevant information is considered.
- Final Decision: The Commissioners are responsible for making the ultimate decision on permit applications.
Who’s involved
- Minnesota Public Utilities Commission: The primary permitting authority.
- Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH): Provides Administrative Law Judges who oversee public hearings and prepare reports for the PUC.

Get Involved
Members of the public are encouraged to provide comments on any matter before the PUC at any time. You can also send comments or contact the PUC about regulatory matters.
Our decision-making is better when we hear from Minnesotans like you. Public input is essential to a fair and reasonable decision making process. Learn more about the PUC's work and how to get involved by watching PUC videos.
The PUC maintains a list of Dockets currently accepting comments. Comments are added to the record and can make a difference in PUC decisions. To see what Dockets are currently open for comment, go here
Other Resources
Other resources regarding permitting, our process and more.
Certificate Of Need
Certain large electric generating facilities and large high-voltage transmission lines are required by law to obtain a certificate of need
Permit changes
The PUC has the authority to amend, revoke or transfer a permit for a large energy infrastructure project.
Permitting guidance
This page provides essential guidance documents and resources for project proposers navigating the energy infrastructure permitting process.
Proposed Wind Farms in the Permitting Process
Docket Number | Project Name | Description |
---|---|---|
17-410 | Freeborn Wind Farm | Freeborn Wind Energy, LLC, an affiliate of Invenergy, LLC, has proposed to construct and operate the 200 MW Freeborn Wind Farm in Freeborn County, Minnesota and Worth County, Iowa |
17-700 | Blazing Star 2 Wind Project | Blazing Star 2 Wind Project is a 200 MW LWECS planned for construction in Lincoln County |
IP6828/WS-09-1197 | Pleasant Valley Wind Project Repower | The proposed repowering of the Pleasant Valley Wind Project will consist of upgrading the existing 100 Vestas V100 turbines with Vestas V110, 2.2 MW turbines. Existing wind turbine towers will remain in place and be used for the installation of the… |
WS-21-643 | Rose Creek Wind Project | The Rose Wind Project is currently operating and consists of 11 turbines that were previously permitted by Mower County, under seven separate limited liability companies. The Rose Wind Project will be repowered, renamed the Rose Creek Wind Project… |
IP7013/WS-19-619 | Big Bend Wind Project | Big Bend Wind, LLC, a subsidiary of Apex Clean Energy, Inc., is proposing the Big Bend Wind Project located within portions of Cottonwood and Watonwan counties, Minnesota. The Big Bend Wind Project is proposing to constructed and operate 47 Nordex N… |
WS-18-700 | Plum Creek Wind Farm and Associated 345 kV Transmission Line Project | Plum Creek Wind Farm, LLC proposes to construct a 414 megawatt (MW) wind farm and associated 345 kV transmission line in Cottonwood, Murray, and Redwood County, Minnesota. |
19-576 | Three Waters Wind Farm | Three Waters Wind Farm, LLC is proposing the 201 MW Three Waters Wind Farm in Jackson County, Minnesota. The proposed project area also extends into Osceola and Dickinson Counties, Iowa. The proposed project is primarily planned to be located within… |
WS-20-866, TL-20-867 | Dodge County Wind Project | Dodge County Wind, LLC (DCW or applicant), a subsidiary of NextEra Energy Resources, LLC, proposes to construct and operate a 259-megawatt (MW) wind farm in Dodge and Steele Counties and an associated 161 kV transmission line in Dodge and Mower… |